Unjam NHS Hospitals: Five Problems and Solutions
Clinically Reviewed by Dr. Andrew Stein MD, Consultant Physician. Last updated: April 2026
The NHS is currently facing an unprecedented ‘flow crisis.’ In early 2026, with waiting lists exceeding 7.5 million and A&E departments frequently operating under ‘black alerts,’ the system is effectively jammed.
The current government – led by Keir Starmer and Wes Streeting (Health Secretary) – seem to think that ‘shaking the broken radio’ will sort it out. After 2 years in government, their ‘reforms’ have had little or no effect.
Why? It is simple. They are not facing, let alone addressing, the following five core problems.
This guide explores the five structural “logjams” within the NHS and the radical solutions—ranging from organisational reform to a total funding overhaul—required to fix them.
The Current State of the “Jammed” NHS
As of 2026, the data remains sobering:
-
The Waiting List: Over 10% of the UK population is waiting for a procedure.
-
The “Trolley Crisis”: Approximately 20,000 patients per month spend over 12 hours on a hospital trolley in A&E corridors after a decision to admit has been made.
-
Ambulance Handover Delays: Because there are no free beds, ambulances remain parked outside hospitals, unable to respond to new 999 calls.
Problem 1: The Mixing of “Hot” and “Cold” Care
Currently, the NHS mixes Emergency (Hot) and Elective (Cold) care in the same buildings. When a winter flu surge or a spike in pneumonia cases hits, ‘cold’ surgery—like hip replacements or cataract removals—are the first to be cancelled to free up beds for emergency admissions.
The Solution: Total Separation
We must legally and physically separate elective hubs from acute hospitals.
-
Surgical Hubs: Dedicated ‘cold’ sites that never take emergency admissions. This ensures that even during a crisis, cancer surgeries and joint replacements continue uninterrupted.
-
Integrated Care Boards (ICBs): These regional bodies must use their power to designate specific ‘clean’ sites within their geography solely for planned procedures. There is little evidence ICBs are using their power to change the way hospitals work.
Note. There are currently 42 ICBs (which are about ‘county-sized’). The government is merging them into 26 ‘ICB Clusters’. This is slow, expensive, illogical (as will be too big, and have no local connection) and take years. It is an unhelpful distraction.
Problem 2: The Five-Day Working Week Myth
Disease does not recognise weekends – or bank holidays. Yet the NHS still largely operates on a ‘Monday to Friday, 9-to-5’ rhythm for non-emergency services.
-
The Weekend Effect: Mortality rates rise 11% for patients admitted on weekends because consultant presence, diagnostic scanning, and pharmacy services are significantly reduced.
-
The Monday Chaos: Because discharges drop by 60% on Saturdays and 40% on Sundays, hospitals become ‘gridlocked’ by Monday morning.
Solution: A True 7-Day NHS
The NHS must modernise its rotas to provide an identical level of service 365 days a year.
-
Consultant-Led 7DS: Senior doctors must be present in normal numbers on Saturdays and Sundays to authorise discharges and lead clinical decisions.
-
The “Tesco, Uber and Booking.com Models”: If retail services can run 24/7 through smart rotas, so can non-elective (emergency) and elective healthcare. This requires a cultural shift in medical contracts to prioritise patient flow over traditional working patterns.
Problem 3: The Social Care “Exit Block”
Roughly 25% of hospital beds are occupied by patients who are “Medically Fit for Discharge” but have nowhere to go. This is known as Delayed Transfer of Care (DTOC).
-
The Funding Gap: Social care is currently run by local councils, whose budgets are not linked to population growth or healthcare demand.
-
The Weekend Stride: Nursing homes often refuse to take patients back on weekends because they believe (rightly) that the NHS support isn’t there. They are right. They copy the NHS’s poor performance.
Solution: Merge Health and Social Care – Properly, not With a Title (DHSC)
The government must bring Social Care under the NHS umbrella with a unified budget.
-
Universal Care: Move toward a system where the state pays for social care, preventing families from having to sell homes to fund end-of-life care.
-
7-Day Discharge: Social care managers must work weekends to “green-light” transfers, ensuring the “exit door” of the hospital remains open 24/7.
Note. There is an irony regarding social care. The beds and staff at nursing and residential homes are still there at the weekend. They are just not asked to do their job. Crazy!
Problem 4: Substandard Information Technology (IT)
The NHS still struggles with fragmented IT systems. A GP often cannot see what a hospital consultant has prescribed, and A&E doctors frequently have no access to a patient’s primary care history.
The Solution: Unified Electronic Patient Records (EPR)
We need subregional, ICB-based EPRs that link directly to the NHS App.
-
One-Click Discharge: Use AI to automate discharge summaries (TTOs), sending prescriptions directly to the patient’s local pharmacy before they even leave the ward.
-
Interoperability: Systems like Epic and Cerner must be mandated to “talk” to each other across all 42 ICBs in England.
Problem 5: Fragmented Regional Silos
The NHS is currently a mishmash of barely connected ‘silos’ – partly for historical reasons. Hospital and ambulance trusts, NHS regions and ICBs, and local councils often have different geographic boundaries and priorities.
Solution: Regional Streamlining
We must align all NHS organisations (Ambulance, Public Health, Education) into 7 consistent regions built around the current NHS England structure.
So. What is the The Big Solution?: “Let’s Go Dutch”
The current tax-funded model, established in 1948, is struggling to cope with PACE (Population growth, Ageing, Complexity, and Expectation).
The Dutch Model (Social Insurance): Many experts (and MyHSN!) believe the UK should transition to a Social Insurance system, similar to the Netherlands or Israel. In this model:
-
Healthcare remains free for the vulnerable.
-
Competition between non-profit insurers drives efficiency.
-
Waiting lists are virtually non-existent because the funding follows the patient immediately.
How the Dutch Model Solves the “Big Five” Problems
1. It Ends the “Postcode Lottery”
In the Netherlands, insurance companies are non-profit but competitive. If one insurer has long waits for hip surgery, patients move to another. This forces hospitals to be efficient. If they don’t see patients quickly, they don’t get paid.
2. It Fixes the Social Care Logjam
The Dutch system includes long-term care insurance. Because the same system pays for both the hospital bed and the home care, there is a massive financial incentive to get patients out of the hospital and back home as soon as they are medically fit.
3. It Mandates 7-Day Productivity
In a social insurance model, ‘the money follows the patient.’ If a hospital closes its theaters on Friday afternoon or weekends, it loses revenue to a clinic that stays open. This naturally ends the ‘5-day working week’ culture without needing a government mandate.
Note. It is generous to state the NHS works 5 days a week – 4 and half is more the mark. Little happens on a Friday afternoon.
4. It Protects the Vulnerable
A common myth is that insurance models hurt the poor. In reality, the Dutch government pays the premiums for low-income citizens through ‘healthcare allowances.’ No one is denied care based on their ability to pay.
Comparison: NHS vs. The Dutch Social Insurance Model
The table below compares the current NHS (Tax-Funded) system with the Netherlands (Social Insurance) model to show how it could solve the ‘jammed’ hospital crisis.
| Feature |
UK NHS (Current) |
Netherlands (Proposed Model) |
| Funding Source |
General taxation and National Insurance. |
Mandatory private insurance premiums + tax subsidies. |
| Provider Choice |
Limited by your local ICB/GP area. |
High; patients choose their insurer and providers. |
| Waiting Lists |
High (7.5m+); rationed by time. |
Virtually non-existent; rationed by capacity. |
| Hospital Flow |
Jammed; ‘Hot’ and ‘Cold’ care mixed. |
Efficient; ‘Money follows the patient’ immediately. |
| Social Care |
Separated (run by local Councils). |
Integrated into the mandatory insurance package. |
| Primary Care |
GP as ‘gatekeeper’ (hard to access hospitals, try to block referrals). |
GP as coordinator (easy, 24/7 access). |
The Challenges of “Going Dutch”
While the results (shorter waits, better cancer outcomes) are tempting, the transition would be difficult:
-
Higher Costs: The Dutch spend a slightly higher percentage of GDP on health than the UK.
-
Administrative Shift: We would need to move from 42 ICBs to a regulated insurance market.
-
Cultural Resistance: Many in the UK view ‘insurance’ as ‘Americanization,’ even though the European model is entirely different from the US system.
Key Takeaway: The Dutch model unjams hospitals by replacing ‘block funding’ (where hospitals get a set budget regardless of how many people they see) with ‘activity-based funding,’ where efficiency is rewarded and social care is fully integrated.
To unjam our hospitals, we must stop blaming ‘the system’ and start reforming it. We need to split elective care, implement a 7-day service, and unify health and social care. Whether through massive tax rises or a ‘Dutch-style’ insurance shift (our preferred model), the status quo is no longer an option.
Other resources
The NHS
A new NHS for a new age: let’s go Dutch
How to convert the NHS into a (Dutch-style) National Health and Social Service